2007 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
PART 3 - CONDOMINIUM
The 2007 session of the Florida
Legislature was extremely active with regard to legislation affecting community
associations in Florida. In Part 1 and Part 2 of our 2007 Legislative Update,
we covered some of
the more important
HOA topics, and while there are more new HOA laws to review, this Part
3 will address some of the major legislative changes to the condominium
law.
Condominium Conversions
(House Bill 7031)
Conversion of existing property to a condominium is currently governed
by Sections 718.604 - 718.622 of the Florida Statutes. Under those statutory
provisions, a developer is required to provide to potential owners a conversion
report prepared by an engineer or architect that discloses the condition
of certain portions of the
condominium. The idea
behind this requirement is that a potential buyer will be informed as to
the conditions present at the condominium in making a purchase decision,
and will know whether expenditures will be
required in the future
to repair or replace portions of the common areas. The developer is also
required to superfund reserves for particular components, which reserves
are known as "converter reserves."
If the developer fails
to do so, it is deemed to grant a statutory warranty to the unit owners
for certain portions of the common elements.
In 2007, the Legislature made changes to these provisions, most of which
are beneficial to owners. First, the conversion report must now address
additional items, including pilings, docks, and irrigation systems. Also,
it has been clarified that the condition of roadways and walkways must
be disclosed under the existing "pavement and concrete" provision, and
"fireproofing" has been replaced with a more specific
"fire protection systems"
requirement. Secondly, a new provision has been added that provides, "each
unit owner and the association are third-party beneficiaries of the report."
This amendment will clarify
that the architect
or engineer retained by the developer is preparing the conversion report
for the benefit of the owners and the association, and provide a cause
of action against the architect or engineer for
professional malpractice
if the report does not accurately disclose conditions. While we have previously
brought claims against architects and engineers under a third-party beneficiary
theory, this amendment
will make it easier.
As stated above, when converting existing buildings to a condominium, a
developer is required to establish converter reserve accounts. Converter
reserves are based on calculations required by Section 718.618, Florida
Statutes. The 2007 amendments to this provision now clarify that the architect
or engineer retained to prepare the conversion report must determine the
age of each existing component, and a developer cannot vote to waive or
reduce the funding of reserves to avoid compliance with the converter reserve-funding
requirements.
The Legislature has also dramatically expanded the statutory warranty that
a developer is deemed to have granted if it fails to properly fund converter
reserves. Under these changes, the warranty that is granted to a conversion
condominium association is the same warranty that is given to the unit
owners of newly constructed condominiums. Finally, these amendments require
that a developer disclose in the sales
contract to a potential
owner whether it has established converter reserve accounts, or whether
it has instead opted to provide a statutory warranty.
Termination of Condominiums
(Senate Bill 314)
Although termination of the condominium form of ownership is a drastic
and rare event, unfortunately the damage caused by recent hurricanes and
tornados in Florida has raised the specter that it may be
more common in the
future.
This bill makes substantial changes in the procedures available under Florida
Statute 718.117 for termination of the condominium form of ownership. It
applies to all condominiums in the state in existence on
or after July 1, 2007.
The new law provides two (2) additional ways to terminate a condominium.
The first is termination because of economic waste or impossibility. Regardless
of any provision to the contrary in a declaration, a condominium may be
terminated by a plan of termination approved by the lesser of:
1) The lowest percentage of voting interest necessary to amend the declaration;
or
2) As otherwise provided in the declaration of condominium for termination.
These procedures apply where the total estimated cost of repairs necessary
to restore the improvements to their former condition or bring them into
compliance with applicable regulations, exceeds the combined
fair market value
of all units after completion of the repairs. It also applies where it
becomes impossible to either operate or reconstruct a condominium in its
prior physical configuration, because of land use laws or regulations.
There are exceptions for timeshare condominiums.
The second additional method is termed "optional termination". Unless the
declaration provides for a lower percentage, a condominium can be terminated
pursuant to a plan of termination approved by at least
80% of the total voting
interest, if not more than 10% of the total voting interest have rejected
the plan of termination by negative vote or written objection. Again there
is an exception for timeshare condominiums.
The new law also provides:
1) The circumstances under which mortgage lienholder approval is required.
2) The powers granted to the condominium association after approval of
the plan of termination, to include proceedings after a natural disaster.
3) The remedies available to any interested person where directors cannot
be located, or where they refuse to act. These remedies include petitioning
the Court for appointment of a receiver.
4) Specifies the required contents of a plan of termination, and provides
for a termination trustee.
5) Provides for the allocation of proceeds from the sale of condominium
property.
6) Grants to unit owners or lienholders the ability to contest a plan of
termination under certain circumstances.
7) The procedures for distribution of assets, including the priority of
such distributions. 8) The termination of the condominium does not prevent
the termination trustee from creating another condominium affecting a portion
of the same property.
Mortgagee Consent to
Amendments (Senate Bill 902, Section 3)
One of the more frustrating situations in operating a Florida condominium
involves the requirement for mortgagee approval of amendments to the declaration.
Some declarations require a super majority, or even 100% approval of mortgagees.
Most of the amendments to a condominium declaration do not affect the interests
of a mortgagee. The problem is not that mortgagees object, but they simply
do not respond to requests for approval. This Bill amends Florida Statute
718.110 to address this problem.
It is important to note that the amendment applies only to mortgages recorded
on or after October 1, 2007. For such mortgages, any provision in the declaration,
articles or bylaws that requires mortgagee approval of amendments will
be enforceable only as to these items:
1) Amendments changing the size of a unit, appurtenances to the unit or
the share of common expenses.
2) An amendment to create timeshares.
3) Amendments that adversely affect the priority of the mortgagee's lien
or its foreclosure rights, or that otherwise materially affect the interest
of the mortgagee.
This amendment also allows the association to rely on the public records
to identify the holders of mortgages, and to obtain their address. The
association must then request in writing from each unit
owner any information
regarding the name and address of the entity to whom mortgage payments
are currently being made. If this address or name is different than that
obtained from the public records, the association must also send notice
to the new address. Where the notice to mortgagee is sent by a method which
establishes proof of delivery, then if the mortgagee fails to respond within
60 days after the date of mailing, the mortgagee is deemed to have consented
to the amendment. Finally, the new law establishes a 5 year statute of
limitations for a mortgagee to challenge an amendment after the date of
recording.
The firm of Taylor
& Carls, P.A., with offices located in Maitland, Melbourne, Tampa and
Palm Coast, Florida, was founded in 1981 and has practiced in the area
of community association law since that date. This
edition was prepared
by Harry W. Carls and Patrick C. Howell of Taylor & Carls, P.A. The
information contained in The Association e-Lawyer should not be acted upon
without professional legal advice. The opinions expressed herein are as
of the date hereof, and this law firm undertakes no obligation to advise
the Association of subsequent changes in the law.
________________________________
(c)2007 Taylor &
Carls, P.A. All Rights Reserved.
The firm can be reached
Toll Free at 1-800-395-6235 or locally at
407-660-1040.
To unsubscribe to
this service, please reply to this address
stating your desire
to be removed from our distribution list.
|